School Uniforms: Symbol not Substance

I am very sad with several news particularly regarding schooling. Detik.com investigated and found that in Riau each student has to pay 1,5 million rupiah for new school uniforms. My Godness! That's in Riau and in government schools. Can you imagine how much those will be in Jakarta and other big cities, and in private schools?

What's uniform for? The concept of wearing school uniform is very good indeed so students will feel in the same stage with their fellows coming from different economic class. No glamorous and fancy clothes wore at schools. However, these school uniforms have functioned more than their main goal. Now it is the schools which want to have different kind of uniforms beside the national school uniforms. This happens from kindergardens! The majority of kindergarden has at least three kinds of school uniforms, t-shirts, sports, and batik.

Excuse me, what are those uniforms for? For students to be comfortable? For schools and teachers to be proud of? For social status? Why schools issued regulations that these school uniforms are a must? No school uniforms, no class. How could be? Do they forget that most of Indonesian family live close by the poverty line? Its ridiculuos. We spend a lot of energy to decide, design, tailor, sell, and put regulation of school uniforms only for social status! Oops, I almost forget, its for economic benefit of certain people, off course. So, parents have to work very hard only for social status of the schools and feed several people who tailored and sold the uniforms. Talking about economic benefit, this uniform case is almost the same with the school texbook policy, where printing companies, the authors, and few functionaries, through the system called "proyek" get most benefit. I will call this as an economic exploitation.

Our schooling system is misleading. It stresses symbols out of substance and learning process. We are very busy to deal with uniforms, performances, but forget that the most inportant thing is learning. No surprised several month ago a primary school student committed suicided because his school uniforms were wet in the morning he should wore it. Schools are too harsh on the uniform regulation. Students are educated with materialistic and symbolistic learning. Dilligence (going to school without absence) and neatness (including wearing uniforms) are parts of evaluation. This happens in a higher education too where there are regulations regarding clothes, shoes, hair, and head scraf.

I am afraid we give too much emphasis on symbol, most importantly religious symbols. Wearing hijab, jubah, peci, and other religious symbol will be regarded good people (off course some of them are). And each of us should have a religion and be good person or look like a good person. People concern too much with symbolic religiosity. Therefore some people use religion (religious symbols) for their own policial and economic benefits. These people selling religion for anything, such as members of parliament, and popular leaders. The problem is their 'selling' is salable. Why because we are educated by materialistic symbols not substance, I am afraid...